
Right now I'm here enjoying Afternoon Delight and enjoying the chat.
topic of discussion-- A mother writes to Sharon complaing of her son's girlfriend. He's 49yrs and divorced with 3 children. The girlfriend is 29, they've been engaged for 3yrs (I got issues with this part) anyhow... The mother complains, that the girlfriend is quite domineering. She demands that the guy can't go to see the ex-wife and kids without her present because she don't trust the ex-wife. She also says that the man must bring home the money and give to her. The man has to share his earnings between the, ex-wife, the mother, the children and the girlfriend. The mother thinks that with this kind of behavior that the her son should call off the wedding. So the calls, emails and faxes are coming in with many various perspectives.
So Blogland what is your take on this situation? Should the man allow his fiancé to tell him who gets his money first? Should the mother have a say in the situation?? What's your view on the man???
6 comments:
The decision is ultimately up to him. I personally would not be staying with a dominaring woman! And no one can demand my money that I work hard for...well exept government, who don't even ast, dem just take it! Damn income tax!!! The most the mother should do is reason withher son and tell him her view, but he is a big man, 40+, him ole enough fi mek his own decision.
Well,I think the man should make his own decision.Unfortunately,if the woman got him whipped then it is easier said than done.The mother can voice her view but it all comes back to him
The man seh is a lot a rigmarole, but y too sweet y too sweet y too sweet...
yea at 40 something he should be big enough to make his own decisions.
The kids should get what they need first. Everything else is up to him. The fiance sounds like she needs a job. He needs to stop being whipped...
Excellent, love it!
» » »
Post a Comment